“Awful and Ungodly”: Why Jim Caviezel Says He’ll Never Work With Robert De Niro

It’s not every day you hear one actor openly refuse to work with another—let alone use words like “ungodly.” But that’s exactly what Jim Caviezel did when asked about the idea of sharing the screen with Robert De Niro. His answer? A flat no.

“I won’t work with Robert De Niro,” Caviezel said. “He’s an awful, ungodly man.”

No elaboration. No backpedaling. Just a firm line in the sand that’s got the entertainment world buzzing.

For an industry that thrives on diplomacy and surface-level unity, this kind of public callout is rare. And whether you agree with Caviezel or not, it’s opened up a much bigger conversation about the tension between faith, politics, and professionalism in modern-day Hollywood.

Different Roads, Same Industry

On paper, Jim Caviezel and Robert De Niro seem like actors from entirely different worlds.

Caviezel, who became a household name after portraying Jesus in The Passion of the Christ, has long been vocal about his Christian faith. Many of his roles have reflected that personal conviction—he’s often chosen characters that align with his worldview, and he’s never shied away from sharing what matters to him offscreen.

Robert De Niro, meanwhile, is a legendary name in film. From Taxi Driver to The Irishman, his career spans decades of transformative roles. He’s also known for his outspoken political views and sharp public commentary—something Caviezel likely sees as conflicting with his own values.

So when Caviezel called De Niro “awful” and “ungodly,” it wasn’t just a personal jab—it felt more like a clash between two very different belief systems.

"He's an Awful, Ungodly Man": Caviezel Drops a Bombshell

Caviezel’s comment didn’t come from an anonymous source or a leaked memo. It was a direct, on-the-record response during an interview—one that quickly made waves across social media and entertainment news outlets.

But what’s behind the choice of words?

While Caviezel didn’t go into detail, many believe it stems from a broader moral and political disconnect. De Niro has often criticized conservative figures and institutions in interviews and speeches. Caviezel, on the other hand, is known for his more traditional views and his support of faith-centered narratives.

The refusal to work with De Niro isn’t just about one man—it’s about the kind of environment Caviezel wants to be part of, and the boundaries he’s willing to draw to protect that.

What's Really Behind the Refusal?

This isn’t just about Caviezel and De Niro. The tension between personal belief and professional obligation is playing out more and more in public. Actors, musicians, and influencers are increasingly expected to take a stand—on everything from politics to religion to social issues.

Hollywood isn’t the neutral zone it once pretended to be. The industry is evolving into a space where values—whether spiritual, political, or ethical—are part of the conversation. And Jim Caviezel’s firm “no” may be just one more sign that more artists are drawing lines based on personal principles.

Will Caviezel’s stance affect his future roles? Will De Niro respond? Or will this moment quietly pass like so many others in the Hollywood news cycle?

Either way, the comment has left a mark. It’s a rare case where a personal boundary was made public—and fans are left wondering where they stand.

Is this a sign of integrity? Or a step too far?

What do you think about Jim Caviezel’s refusal to work with De Niro? Does personal belief have a place in professional choices? Let us know in the comments—or share your take with fellow fans.